Oak National Academy — Judicial Review proceedings launched

Photograph of school children approaching the gates of the British Museum in London (photograph © James Jiao / Adobe Stock)
Photograph © James Jiao / Adobe Stock
Martin Reed

Martin Reed

Martin leads the SoA's Communications team. He oversees our strategic communications and campaign-based activities, including PR, social media, events and partnerships.
Trade organisations partner on Judicial Review proceedings in relation to the Government's new arm’s length body

The British Educational Suppliers Association (BESA), the Publishers Association (PA), and the Society of Authors (SoA) have joined forces as co-claimants in Judicial Review proceedings in respect of the Department for Education’s proposed operating model for its new arm’s length body, Oak National Academy. The National Education Union (NEU) are also participating in the claim as an “interested party.” A formal judicial review claim was lodged with the court earlier this week.

This step results from growing concerns among authors, teachers, unions, publishers, tech innovators, and other educational suppliers and a fundamental lack of meaningful engagement from government in response. It also follows letters before claim issued by BESA and the Publishers Association earlier this year.

Caroline Wright, Director General of BESA, said:

For decades, teachers have enjoyed the freedom of choice over how to deliver the curriculum supported by a dynamic and world-leading educational publishing sector. The Department for Education’s establishment of a new curriculum body poses an existential risk to the future viability of the sector which, in its current form, will result in an erosion of teacher choice over how to deliver the national curriculum.

Launching a legal challenge of the new curriculum body is the sector’s option of last resort, we have tried to engage with the Department for Education over its creation of its new curriculum body for months, but they have refused any meaningful mitigations that would protect competition within the market.

Dan Conway, CEO of the Publishers Association, said:

At every step of this process we have sought dialogue and compromise and this development is a last resort that we very much wanted to avoid. Unfortunately, we and our joint claimants felt we had no remaining course of action other than to challenge the Department for Education’s plans via judicial review. 

The government’s plans for Oak will be an unprecedented and unevidenced intervention that will cause irreparable damage to the education sector as we know it. The government is in effect creating a one-size-fits-all state publisher that promotes a single curriculum, controlled by the Education Secretary of the day. This will undo years of work by publishers who have invested expertise over many decades in creating a rich range of world-leading resources for school children across the country.

There is simply too much at stake to let these plans proceed unopposed. The potential impact on teacher autonomy, learner outcomes, and curriculum diversity and quality is too significant. That is why authors, publishers, educational suppliers, school groups, teachers’ unions, and others have all voiced strong concern over these plans.

Nicola Solomon, Chief Executive of the Society of Authors, said:

Ever since the government first announced its intention to convert Oak National Academy into an arm’s length body to the Department of Education, we have worked with our industry partners to raise concerns about the impact this will have on educational authors and publishers, and on the students and teachers who need the tools they create. This action is only necessary because the government has chosen to ignore those concerns.

If we don’t act now, educators will be left with one set of state approved online resources which will threaten diversity and choice, remove financial incentives, and damage the healthy competition which is at the heart of educational publishing. The result will likely be a weaker overall pool of resources, greater challenges for teachers, and a negative impact on students’ learning.

Kevin Courtney, Joint Gen Sec, NEU, said:

Converting Oak from an emergency response to Covid to a permanent part of government is a decision with ominous implications. Without consultation or parliamentary debate,  the government has taken a long stride towards directing the detail of teachers’ work. Unless its actions are challenged, what is now presented as an optional resource will soon become the norm in schools. The government should recognise its limits: it does not have the capacity, the imagination and the understanding to intervene in this way.

EWG Author nominates Wayland Editor for Editorial Best Practice Award

26 April 2019

SoA welcomes Ofsted’s new focus on ‘quality of education’

3 April 2019

EWG introduces new Editorial Best Practice Award

12 December 2018

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Suzanne Swan
26 January 2023 14:44

From little acorns over-sized Oaks grow.

Katherine Pate
Katherine Pate
22 December 2022 11:49

I am glad to see the SOA with other partners is bringing this action. I have written to my MP, who is sympathetic (Karin Smyth, Labour) and had a letter from Nick Gibb, who does say that the Dept of Education is not intending Oak resources to displace other high quality resources. But with school underfunding, surely most schools will opt for free Oak materials, rather than pay for others? So we will lose a wide range of paid for materials eventually, and all the expertise of the people who create them, and our classrooms will be the poorer for… Read more »

Seton During
14 December 2022 19:20

I suggest our inputs include coaxing towards boosting International sales of our books because they already have a good foundation on several grounds – embassies, High Commissions, Consulates, UK-based Organisations, activists, etc. Starting with the most challenging – China. Seton During

Carrol Nelson
Carrol Nelson
14 December 2022 16:28

Thank you for drawing this to my attention. As an Independent culturally diverse children’s book, author, parent and grandparent, of African Caribbean descent who has lived in England for 53 years and acquired over 30 year’s wealth of experience working in the public health sector, education and community, this is indeed very concerning. As I was not aware that the government are planning to implement within our education system a Single Curriculum controlled by the Education Secretary. But what does this means? Let us examine their reason further, why they want to hurriedly push this to avoid engaging in any… Read more »

We'd love to hear from you. Please comment.x